6 Lessons from Finland and Iceland For Our Republic Movement

Republicans all over the country can draw several important lessons from countries like Iceland and Finland, both of which are stable, successful republics with democratic, ceremonial presidencies. Here's what we can learn:

1. Ceremonial Presidency Can Replace Monarchy Without Drama

Both Iceland and Finland have non-executive presidents who serve largely ceremonial roles, similar to the British monarch. This shows it's possible to:

- Retain national traditions, continuity, and symbolism.

- Avoid concentrating power in the hands of the president.

- Elect a head of state without destabilizing the political system.

2. Direct Election Ensures Democratic Legitimacy

In both countries, the president is directly elected by the people, giving the role democratic legitimacy that a hereditary monarch lacks. British republicans can argue:

• A head of state chosen by the public is more democratic and inclusive.

• Public elections foster accountability and relevance.

3. Simplicity and Cost Efficiency

Republics like Iceland and Finland operate more cost-effectively than monarchies. They avoid the large public expenditures associated with royal households, security, and estates.

-This strengthens the economic case for republicanism.

- It shows how symbolic leadership doesn’t require grandeur or wealth.

4. National Identity and Unity Don't Depend on Royalty

Iceland and Finland maintain strong national identities and unity without royal figures. This proves:

- Monarchy isn’t essential for national cohesion.

- Modern civic values, not aristocratic legacy, can anchor patriotism.

5. Transparency and Meritocracy

Presidents in Iceland and Finland are subject to accountability, media scrutiny, and public opinion. This reinforces values of:

-Transparency: No secrecy or inherited privilege.

- Meritocracy: Heads of state earn their roles.

6. Smooth Transitions and Institutional Stability

Regular elections and fixed terms mean leadership transitions are predictable and peaceful. In contrast, monarchic transitions depend on death or abdication, which are less controllable.