How Pro-Monarchy Media Shapes What Britain Thinks Is “Normal”
The British press and the Royals—a long, tangled, borderline co-dependent relationship. Several UK newspapers are very clearly pro-royalty, often portraying the monarchy in a favourable (often fawning) light, acting almost like unofficial Palace PR. Here are the main ones:
12/28/20252 min read


1. The Daily Mail - Royal stance: Fiercely pro-monarchy
The Mail is probably the most enthusiastic royal cheerleader in the UK. It covers royal weddings, births, tours and even the Queen’s handbag with breathless admiration. It often defends senior royals—particularly Kate and William—and is known for its antagonism towards Meghan and Harry. Their coverage helped shape much of the public backlash against the Sussexes.
Example:
Headlines like “Regal, radiant, ready to reign!” (Kate) versus “Why won’t Meghan stop moaning?”
2. The Telegraph - Royal stance: Traditionalist, quietly loyal
The Telegraph takes a more conservative approach. It often defends the institution of the monarchy as part of British heritage and culture. You’ll see think-pieces on the Queen’s “quiet dignity” or Charles’ “visionary leadership” on climate. It’s polite but loyalist.
Example:
“The King understands his role—and it’s not to be a politician” or “William is the steady hand Britain needs”


The Sun - Royal stance: Populist, cheerleader, occasionally cheeky
As a tabloid, The Sun loves big royal stories—weddings, babies, scandals, outfits. It’s often pro-monarchy but with a “racist lads down the pub” tone. It defends the Firm (especially Kate and Wills), but also doesn’t shy from sensational headlines if scandal erupts.
Example:
“Kate's bump is blooming!” and “Megxit Mayhem”
The Express - Royal stance: Hopelessly devoted, sycophantic
This paper lives for royal stories. Some days, the front page might as well be a royal press release. It pushes the "strong, united monarchy" line hard and frequently publishes over-the-top praise for William, Kate, and Charles.
Example:
“Queen Camilla wins over the nation” or “William’s powerful pledge to Diana’s legacy”


Dishonorable Mentions
Hello! Magazine – royal fluff. Never critical. Just fashion, smiles, and royal babies.
Tatler – For posh people by posh people. Covers royals as part of the upper-class tapestry. Mostly positive.
If you want a more critical or even republican-leaning view, you’re better off looking at:
The Guardian – Often questions the monarchy’s relevance and cost.
Private Eye – Satirical, takes the mickey out of everyone, Royals included.
The National (Scotland) - always first to report on royal scandals and share controversial news that others won't.


Let us know of other pro-republic/anti-monarchy news sources!






