“‘I Don’t Believe in Bloodline Superiority’: Ash Sarkar Hits a Nerve in Modern Britain

Ash Sarkar’s statement “I don’t believe in bloodline superiority” is powerful because it operates on several levels at once—moral, historical, political, and rhetorical.

1. It Directly Challenges a Core Justification of Oppression

The idea of bloodline superiority underpins many toxic hierarchies:

Aristocracy and monarchy

Racism and white supremacy

Caste systems

By rejecting it outright, Sarkar attacks the foundational logic that says power, intelligence, or worth can be inherited biologically. She isn’t arguing about policy details—she’s rejecting the premise itself.

2. It Uses Moral Clarity Instead of Technocratic Language

The statement is short, values-driven, and absolute.

Rather than saying something like “there’s limited evidence for genetic advantage across populations,” she says she doesn’t believe in it at all.

That matters because:

- It frames the issue as an ethical line, not a debate club topic

- It refuses false neutrality toward harmful ideas

- It’s easy for ordinary people to understand and repeat

3. It Rejects Elitism Without Targeting Individuals

She’s not attacking a person or group; she’s rejecting an outdated ideology.

That makes the statement harder to dismiss as “cancel culture" or “personal resentment”.

It shifts the focus from who benefits to why the belief exists at all.

4. It Collapses Racist and Classist Arguments Into One

Bloodline superiority isn’t only about race—it’s also about:

- Class inheritance (“old money,” pedigree)

- National identity

- Cultural purity myths

By naming “bloodline” rather than “race,” she exposes how these ideas share the same dangerous logic, even when they pretend to be different.

5. It Forces Monarchists Into an Uncomfortable Position

Once someone says they don’t believe in bloodline superiority:

- Agreeing with it sounds obviously immoral

- Disagreeing requires defending hierarchy based on birth

That puts defenders of elitism on the back foot, where they must either:

- Retreat into vagueness

- Explicitly endorse inherited superiority

-Acknowledge they believe their own blood and family members are inferior

6. It Signals Solidarity Without Sentimentality

The statement implies people deserve dignity and opportunity because they are human, not because of ancestry.

The line is powerful because it attacks the root of inequality. Monarchists can try and use myths, excuses and avoidance, but the truth remains: bloodline superiority is wrong. Now let's do something about it!

Feeling inspired? Join our Whatsapp group and get to know other Green Party members working on democratic reform!