On the controversy of Wales' English Prince
Wales does not need a prince, let alone an english one. Here is why the title "Prince Of Wales" is so controversial:
9/21/20251 min read
The title Prince of Wales has been controversial primarily due to its historical and political significance, especially in the context of Welsh-English relations. Here’s why:
1. Conquest of Wales and Symbolic Submission
The title “Prince of Wales” was appropriated by the English Crown after Edward I of England conquered Wales in the late 13th century.
In 1301, Edward I gave the title to his son as a symbol of dominance over Wales.
It replaced the earlier tradition of native Welsh rulers, such as Llywelyn ap Gruffudd, who had held the title Tywysog Cymru (Prince of Wales) before being defeated and killed by the English.
Controversy: For many Welsh people, the title is a reminder of conquest and subjugation, not a celebration of unity.
2. Lack of Welsh Connection
The Princes of Wales are always English royals with no cultural or linguistic connection to Wales.
Controversy: The title is imposed rather than earned, and lacks meaningful representation of Welsh identity or autonomy.
3. National Identity and Devolution
In modern times, especially after Welsh devolution and the establishment of the Senedd (Welsh Parliament), questions of national identity and self-governance have become more prominent.
Controversy: As Wales reasserts its national identity, the presence of a "Prince of Wales" appointed by the English monarchy is patronising.
4. Recent Protests and Public Opinion
After Charles became King in 2022, his son William was made Prince of Wales.
This triggered public debate and protests, including petitions calling for an end to the title altogether.
Controversy: Many called for consultation with the Welsh public, questioning why such a symbolic title was bestowed without democratic input.
One day, Wales will be prince-free. Until that day, the struggle continues!