Why is the “If you don’t like the monarchy, move to a republic,” response wrong?

The monarchist retort, “If you don’t like it, move to a republic,” is flawed for several reasons, both logical and democratic:

1. It shuts down democratic discourse

At its core, the statement is anti-democratic. In a constitutional democracy, citizens have every right to question institutions, including the monarchy, and advocate for reform or abolition through peaceful and legal means. Telling someone to “leave” rather than engage in debate stifles political discussion, which is the lifeblood of a healthy democracy.

2. Citizenship isn't conditional on agreement

Living in a country doesn't require unconditional acceptance of all its institutions. People don't owe blind loyalty to the status quo. Wanting to change a system doesn't make you less British, just as criticising the Prime Minister doesn't mean you must emigrate.

3. It appeals to emotion, not reason

This argument is a form of the ad hominem or dismissive fallacy — it avoids engaging with the actual criticisms of the monarchy and instead targets the person making them. It’s a deflection, not a rebuttal.

4. No institution is above scrutiny

The monarchy, like any public institution, is funded by taxpayers and symbolically represents the country. It is therefore entirely appropriate for citizens to examine whether it serves the public interest in the modern era. Suggesting that critics should “just leave” implies the monarchy is somehow sacred or beyond challenge, which is incompatible with open society.

5. Most people can’t just up and leave

Moving to another country is not a realistic or fair suggestion for most people. It's expensive, legally complicated, emotionally taxing, and may not even be possible. The notion trivialises the legitimate concerns of citizens and presumes exile as the only alternative to submission — a rather authoritarian stance.

In summary, “If you don’t like it, leave” is not a real argument. It's a defensive soundbite that betrays a lack of confidence in the monarchy's ability to stand up to scrutiny on its merits. A better society encourages debate, not exodus. This is our country too and we are not going anywhere. We are on the right side of history and trying to create a fairer society for everyone.